User agent detail

Wget/1.14 (linux-gnu)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yeswgetOffline Browser Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yeswgetOffline Browser0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Wget 1.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesWgetclose0.18904 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Wget 1.14 GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Wget 1.14closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Wget 1.14 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesWgetclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library wgetcloseclosecloseclosemiscclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:50 | by ThaDafinser