User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows CE 5.2) AppleWebKit/534.51 (KHTML, like Gecko) MotorolaWebKit/2.2.2.13 Safari/534.51
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsce.yaml
Motorola WebKit 2.2.2Windows CE 5.2Webkit 534.51mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.51closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows CE MotorolarolaWebKitsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows CE 5.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.51Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola WebKit 2.2.2Webkit 534.51Windows CE 5.2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux MotorolaEvokeFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:49 | by ThaDafinser