User agent detail

SAMSUNG-S8300-ORANGE/S8300BVHL2 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.5 NexPlayer/2.9.1 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungS8300-ORANGE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.05302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-S8300-ORANGE S8300BVHL2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungGT-S8300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 2.9 SamsungS8300-ORANGEsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungS8300-ORANGEcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 SamsungS8300mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SamsungGT-S8300Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:49 | by ThaDafinser