User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; electricmonk/3.2.0 +https://www.duedil.com/our-crawler/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
yesDueDil CrawlerBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesDueDil CrawlerBot/Crawler0.05702 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.19304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesour-crawlerclose0.01601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:49 | by ThaDafinser