User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-297.php
Firefox 3.6Win7 6.11.9.2 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.02001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.10closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.10closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.10closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.10closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.10Gecko 20100914Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40808 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.10Gecko 1.9.2Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:48 | by ThaDafinser