User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows XP Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 3.1Gecko 1.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.07302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 3.1.10closeWindows 5.1email-clientcloseclose0.19904 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 3.1 Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Lightning 1.0.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 3.1.10closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.17Gecko 20110414Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37208 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 3.1.10Gecko 1.9.2Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:48 | by ThaDafinser