User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia6500s-1/04.81; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/1.8.0.50.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6500s-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.15505 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 1.8Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia6500s-1smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 04.81;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 1.8.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia6500s-1closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 1.8.0.50.5Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6500s-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 1.8.0Gecko Series40 Nokia6500 slidemobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.8closeNokia Series 40 Nokia6500sFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.04001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:48 | by ThaDafinser