User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1284.49
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera 18.0.1284.49Windows 7Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 18.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1284.49closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1284closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.57closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1284.49WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:47 | by ThaDafinser