User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Nokia501) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.5Nokia Asha Platform 1.0Gecko NokiaAsha 501mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Symbian Nokia501smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close Nokia501closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.449 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 501closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Nokia Asha Platform 1.0NokiaAsha 501mobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close Nokia501Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:47 | by ThaDafinser