User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.204 Safari/534.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Chrome 10.0FreeBSD unknownunknown unknowngeneral DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 10.0WebKit FreeBSD Desktop0.05902 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 10.0.648.204closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 10.0.648.204closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 10.0WebKit FreeBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 10.0.648.204closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 10.0.648closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 10.0.648.204closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 10.0.648.204WebKit 534.16FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 10Webkit 534.16FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 10.0.648.204closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:46 | by ThaDafinser