User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; LIFETAB_P9514 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 31.0.1650.59Android 4.0.3Blink MedionLifetab P9514tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0MedionLifeTab P9514Tabletyesyes0.01801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.257 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0MedionLifetab P9514tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.0.3MedionLifetab P9514closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.0.3MedionLifetab P9514tabletyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.0LifetabP9514Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:46 | by ThaDafinser