User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 2.0; xx) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser Tizen 2.0Webkit 537.1mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Tizen 2.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 537.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 2.0closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:46 | by ThaDafinser