User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; InfiNet 0.1; Haiku) AppleWebKit/528+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebPositive/528+ Safari/528+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-haiku.yaml
WebPositive Haiku Webkit 528desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 528closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 528close desktop-browsercloseclose0.283 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WebPositive WebKit Haiku OS desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 528close closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 528 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebPositive Webkit 528Haiku desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:46 | by ThaDafinser