User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; SXZ-PDX0-01 Build/SXZ-PDX0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.0unknown SXZPDX0-01Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.0SXZPDX0-01Tabletyesyes0.08603 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.0.3FreelanderPD10mobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.0.3SXZ-PDX0-01closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.155 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.0.3FreelanderPD20tabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.0FreelanderPD10Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:46 | by ThaDafinser