User agent detail

SonyEricssonw580i/R4EA Java/SEMC-Java/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 sonyericssonw580i
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonw580i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC SymbianOS SonyEricssonW580iMobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonw580i R4EAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonW580imobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java Sony Ericssonw580ifeature phoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonw580icloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.163 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson w580icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonW580imobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:46 | by ThaDafinser