User agent detail

AmigaVoyager/3.2 (AmigaOS/MC680x0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Amiga Voyager 3.2AmigaOS desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.04101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AmigaVoyager 3.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Amiga Voyager 3.2closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Amiga Voyager 3.2 AmigaOS desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
AmigaVoyager 3.2closeAmigaOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Voyager 3.2 AmigaOS desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:45 | by ThaDafinser