User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/29.0.1547.62 Chrome/29.0.1547.62 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 29.0.1547.62Ubuntu Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 29.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.01801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 29.0.1547.62closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 29.0Blink Ubuntu desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 29.0.1547closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 29.0.1547.62WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 29.0.1547.62Blink Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 29.0.1547.76closeMac OS X 10.8.3Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:45 | by ThaDafinser