User agent detail

NANaverNDrive/3.0.0(Android OS 4.1.2;PANTECH IM-A860S)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechIM-A860S Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.03401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NANaverNDrive 3.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid PantechVega N˚ 6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.269 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1PantechIMsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid PantechIM-A860Scloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.436 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android PantechVega N˚ 6mobile:smartyescloseclose0.072 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06502 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:45 | by ThaDafinser