User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/6.0; Microsoft Outlook 15.0.4420)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Outlook 2013 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.01901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Outlook 2013 closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Outlook 2013closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.212 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Microsoft Outlook 15.0Trident 6.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.01901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:41 | by ThaDafinser