User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.1; Linux 2.6.27.7-134.fc10.x86_64; X11; x86_64) KHTML/4.1.3 (like Gecko) Fedora/4.1.3-4.fc10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Konqueror 4.1Fedora 4.1.3KHTML desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.1KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.14404 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.1KHTML Fedora 4.1desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.1;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.1closeFedora 4.1.3closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.153 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.1 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.1KHTML 4.1.3Fedora 10desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:41 | by ThaDafinser