User agent detail

Opera/4.03 (Windows NT 4.0; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 4.03Windows NT 4.0 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera WinNT 4.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 4.03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 4.03closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.174 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 4.03Presto Windows NTdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 4.03closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 4.3closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 4.03closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 4.3 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 4.03 Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 4.03closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:39 | by ThaDafinser