User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0(BlackBerry; U; 5.2.0.104; en-us; 8520/5.2.0.104) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.1.0.216 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
UC Browser 8.1RIM OS unknownunknown RIMCurveMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.1U2 RIM OS RIMCurveMobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
BlackBerry Browser closeRIM OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.1 BlackBerry OS RIMBlackBerrysmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
BlackBerry 5.2.0.104)closeBlackBerry closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.1.0closeBlackBerry OS BlackBerrycloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeBlackBerryOS 1.0.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.158 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BlackBerry Browser BlackBerry OS BlackBerryBlackBerrycloseclosecloseclosecloseclose1.109 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.1Gecko BlackBerry OS RIMBlackBerry Curve 8520mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:38 | by ThaDafinser