User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0_(Smartfren-E781A/E2_SQID_V0.1.6; U; REX/4.3;BREW/3.1.5.189; Profile/MIDP-2.0_Configuration/CLDC-1.1; 240*320; CTC/2.0)_Obigo Browser/Q7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
Obigo Q 7Brew 3.1.5.189 mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 7closeBrew 3.1.5.189mobile-browseryescloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Brew 3.1SmartfrenGALAXY Tab 3 7.0" WiFismartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0_(Smartfren-E781A/E2_SQID_V0.1.6;close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7closeBREW 3.1.5closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7 Brew 3.1.5.189mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SmartfrenE781AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:38 | by ThaDafinser