User agent detail

LGE-MX9700_VEZ/1.0 Mozilla/4.1 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; ) 240X400
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGMX9700 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident LGMX9700smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0close LGMX9700closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 LGMX9700 VEZmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGMX9700Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:37 | by ThaDafinser