User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 1.0; xx; Samsung NX300) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/1.0 Mobile Android compatible
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/camera/os-tizen.yaml
Tizen 1.0Webkit 534.16SamsungNX300camerayes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Tizen 1.0SamsungNX300smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 1.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungNX300closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 1.0WebKit 534.16Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.16Tizen 1.0SamsungNX300camerayescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:37 | by ThaDafinser