User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-S508/1.0*MzU0NTMxMDA2MDczMzYx UP.Browser/5.0.5.1 (GUI) UP.Link/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-S508 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 SamsungSGH-S508Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-S508 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.5.1close SamsungSGH-S508mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 SamsungSGH-S508smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 5.0.5close SamsungSGH-S508closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.5.1 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 5.0 SamsungSGH-S508mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSGH-S508Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:37 | by ThaDafinser