User agent detail

LG-GT505-Orange/V10e Browser/Teleca-Q7.1 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-obigo.yaml
Obigo Q 7.1 LGGT505mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.08703 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-GT505-Orange V10ecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGGT505mobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGGT505smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGGT505closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo Q7.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.088 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGGT505closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.1 LGGT505mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGGT505Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:36 | by ThaDafinser