User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.3.5; en-US; iNote_mini) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.7.0.315 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
UC Browser 8.7.0.315Android 2.3.5 iTeliNote minismartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux MicromaxA54mobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 Android 2.3iTeliNote minismartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.315 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Android 2.3.5iTeliNote minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:36 | by ThaDafinser