User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; TCL S720T Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.2unknown TCLS720TMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2TCLS720TMobile Phoneyesyes0.02601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.2TCLS720Tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.2TCLS720Tcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.2.2TCLS720mobile:smartyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05102 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:36 | by ThaDafinser