User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; LG-GB270) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGB270 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close LGGB270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGGB270smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGGB270closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.206 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.326 LGLGGB270closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Gecko LGGB270mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close LGGB270Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:36 | by ThaDafinser