User agent detail

mozilla/5.0 (iphone; cpu iphone os 8_3 like mac os x) applewebkit/600.1.4 (khtml, like gecko) version/8.0 mobile/12f70 safari/600.1.4 (compatible; googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-797.php
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.02301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
applewebkit 600.1.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 8.0closeiOS RobotBot or Crawlermobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesgooglebotclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeiPhone OS 8.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot 2.1WebKit 600.1.4iOS 8.3AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:35 | by ThaDafinser