User agent detail

SIE-A57/03 UP.Browser/5.0.3.3.1.e.4 (GUI)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SiemensA57 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.03701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SIE-A57 03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.3.3.1.e.4close SiemensA57mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 SiemensA57smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 5.0.3close SiemensA57closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.3.3.1.e.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 5.0 SiemensA57mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SiemensA57Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04902 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:35 | by ThaDafinser