User agent detail

SAMSUNGSGH-i450/UCWEB8.7.0.187/28/10086
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.7Series60 Gecko Samsungi450mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNGSGH-i450 UCWEB8.7.0.187closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SamsungSGH-i450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 SamsungSGH-i450smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.187close closecloseclosecloseclose0.042 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.187 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Series60 Samsungi450mobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:35 | by ThaDafinser