User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) SkypeUriPreview Preview/0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
yesSkypeUriPreviewBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSkypeUriPreviewBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.457 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:35 | by ThaDafinser