User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; PMP7170B3G Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.90 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 27.0.1453.90Android 4.0.4WebKit PrestigioPMP7170B3Gtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.10303 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.295 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0PrestigioPMP7170B3Gtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4PrestigioPMP7170B3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.109 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink Android 4.0.4PrestigioMultipad 7.0 Prime 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.0PrestigioPMP7170B3GTabletyesyescloseclose0.08202 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:34 | by ThaDafinser