User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; xx; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox 2.0Windows NT 4.0Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8WinNT 4.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.06302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Windows NTdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0Gecko 20061010Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8.1Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:34 | by ThaDafinser