User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 SonyEricssonC510av/R1DA Browser/NetFront/3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 JavaPlatform/JP-8.4.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonC510av Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.05502 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront Sony EricssonC510avfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SonyEricssonC510avcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Sony EricssonSony Ericsson C510avcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 Sony EricssonC510avmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:33 | by ThaDafinser