User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; ) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.34 Safari/534.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Chrome 11.0Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.04501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34close desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 11.0WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34close closecloseclosecloseclose0.122 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34WebKit 534.24a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24 desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:33 | by ThaDafinser