User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android v1.02_15.13-ES-2011.03.29; en-za; AIRIS-OnePAD Build/ECLAIR) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AirisOnePAD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.305 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid AirisOnePADcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris closeAndroid 1.02.15.13-ES-2011.03.29closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aliyun Browser Webkit 530.17Aliyun OS 1.02AIRIS-OnePADmobile:smartyescloseclose0.103 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05702 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:32 | by ThaDafinser