User agent detail

SonyEricssonW958c/R100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; 405) Opera 8.65 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonW958c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.65Presto Symbian OS Sony EricssonW958cfeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.65close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonW958ccloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.65 Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W958ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.65 Sony EricssonW958cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonW958cFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:32 | by ThaDafinser