User agent detail

Mozilla/1.10 [en] (Compatible; RISC OS 3.70; Oregano 1.10)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
Oregano 1.10RISC OS 3.70 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 1.0Gecko Desktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Oregano 1.10closeRISK OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Oregano 1.10 RISC OS 3.70yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Oregano 1.10closeRISC OS 3.70closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 1.10 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Oregano 1.10 RISC OS 3.70desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:31 | by ThaDafinser