User agent detail

Opera Mini 4/SonyEricssonV630iv/R1ED Browser/NetFront/3.3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonV630iv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.3NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.02001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.3closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.3NetFront Sony EricssonV630ivsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini SonyEricssonV630ivclose closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.3close SonyEricssonV630ivcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini Sony EricssonSony Ericsson V630ivcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.456 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.3 Sony EricssonV630ivmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.3close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.3Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:31 | by ThaDafinser