User agent detail

ALCATEL-OT871A/987 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q05A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Obigo Q 5A AlcatelOne Touch 871Amobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA AlcatelOne Touch 871AMobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ALCATEL-OT871A 987closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM AlcatelOT-871Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q05A AlcatelOT871Asmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOT871Acloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A AlcatelOne Touch 871Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose AlcatelOT-871AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.01601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:30 | by ThaDafinser