User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+ LG Browser/5.00.00(+mouse+3D+SCREEN+TUNER; LGE; GLOBAL-PLAT4; 03.09.22; 0x00000001;); LG NetCast.TV-2012
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
LG Browser 5.00 Webkit 534.26LGNetCast TV 2012television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 534.26closeLinux LGGLOBAL-PLAT4closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.112 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.26Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 5.00Webkit 534.26 LGNetCast TV 2012televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:30 | by ThaDafinser