User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5611 Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/7.1.34814/36.1370; U; xx) Presto/2.12.423 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Opera Mini 7.1 Presto 2.12.423SamsungGT-S5611mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.1Presto 2.2JAVA SamsungMobile Deviceyes0.02301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.1.34814closeJVM SamsungGT-S5611mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.1Presto SamsungGT-S5611smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.1.34814close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.1.34814close SamsungGT-S5611closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.1.34814close closecloseclosecloseclose0.089 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.1.34814Presto 2.12.423 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.1Presto 2.12.423 SamsungGT-S5611mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 7.1close SamsungGT-S5611Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:30 | by ThaDafinser