User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0+(compatible;+Baiduspider/2.0;++http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesBaiduspider Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBaiDuBot/Crawler0.02901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Baiduspider 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesBaiduspiderclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBaidu SpiderSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesBaiduspiderclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesBaiduspiderCrawler0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Baidu Crawler Bot 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBaiduspiderclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:30 | by ThaDafinser