User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_7; xx) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/530.17 Skyfire/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-skyfire.yaml
Skyfire 2.0Android Webkit 530.17mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Skyfire 2.0WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.02301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Skyfire 2.0closeOS X 10.5.7AppleSafarimobile-browseryescloseclose0.233 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 4.0WebKit Mac 10.5desktop0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeOS X 10.5.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Skyfire 2.0closeMac OS X 10.5.7closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Skyfire 2.0closeOS X 10.5.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SkyFire 2.0WebKit 530.17Mac OS X 10.5.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Skyfire 2.0Webkit 530.17Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 4.0closeMac OS X 10.5.7SkyfireSkyfire BrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:29 | by ThaDafinser