User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-DE; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030619 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Netscape 7.1WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 7.1Gecko WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.05902 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 7.1closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 7.1closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 7.1closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 7.1Gecko 20030619Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 7.1Gecko 1.4Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:29 | by ThaDafinser