User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) MxNitro/1.1.0.2000 Chrome/39.0.2146.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Maxthon Nitro 1.1Win8 6.2unknown 537.36unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon Nitro 1.1Blink Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.02101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2146.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 39.0.2146.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.265 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 39.0Blink Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2146.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 39.0.2146closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2146.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.2146.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon Nitro 1.1.0Blink Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2146.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.01601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:28 | by ThaDafinser