User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 Lightning/4.0.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-689.php
Thunderbird 38.0MacOSX 10.1038.0 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 38.0Gecko 38.0MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 38.0.1closeOS X 10.10email-clientcloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 38.0 Mac 10.10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.10closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Lightning 4.0.0closeMac OS X 10.10closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 38.0.1closeOS X 10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 38.0Gecko 20100101Mac OS X 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 38.0.1Gecko 38.0OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:28 | by ThaDafinser